Sunday, December 18, 2011

SILENCE: JUST SUFFER PEACEFULLY

SILENCE: JUST SUFFER PEACEFULLY

By Fahim A. Knight-El

The world within last ten years has become more complex because in many ways 9-11 changed the rules and established new global rules that were rooted in the New World Order agenda and it has forced humanity to make certain political, social and economic transitions. There are varied and different moves being made right beneath our eyes on the global chessboard, but the Invisible Rulers have mastered the art of deception and propaganda in order to keep us sheep in line and in control (even prior to 9/11 in which for centuries they have done a good job at this). Many of my thoughts comes from a life body of research and experience in which has led me to think outside the box and confront my own fears relative to the possibility of "What if" (many choose to dismiss the notion of "conspiracy") but my empirical findings have led me to accept that there are powerful hidden forces driving humanity which is unknown to humanity (the sheepel does not even know that they have been hoodwinked and cable-towed). The New World Order and global agenda is real and there are many major (really not many major players—12 Dynastic families that control the world) and minor players (low level operatives) who are responsible for carrying out their bidding.

England (United Kingdom) is the mother of the United States (Babylon or Baby London) and Amschel Rothschild and the boys initially set-up international banking houses in five European countries. This was the formal beginning of the web in which Dynastic Families intermarried based on wealth and blood lineage. They have always adopted the utmost secrecy and has often hid in orders such as the Jesuits, Illuminati, Freemasonry, etc., which only served as layers of protection, deception and distraction. Some believe that the Bank of England is the seat of world power and this is where the world of high finance starts and end. Some believe that the Royal Institute is more powerful and more controlling within this new global paradigm than the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

No one person or group of people have all the answers to the puzzle, but through visiting different Internet sites (global technology allows to access massive amounts of information in real time) and engaging certain research this allows us to at least consider knowledge and information that is geared towards assisting us in connecting the dots and decoding deceptive hidden agenda.

Truth has the ability to alter the balance of power by eliminating and/or isolating and uprooting past agreed truths that were formulated as false control stratagem to shield evidence that might-be pointing to the contrary. It has almost become sinister and borders on being treasonous to offer or suggest a point of view, opposite of the one being advocated by the status quo. The status quo has the masses of the global population conditioned that oftentimes they do not even have to defend their contentions. Moreover, those who are being deceived by the conspirators will often run to the defense of the conspirator and serve in opposition to anyone attempting to expose their chicanery.

I think until the American people wake up and demand better from our government, we will continue to see high levels of reactionary influences coming from government, because for a long time now our democracy has been compromised and co-opted by special interest groups and by an Invisible Elitist sector. I do not think electoral politics and voting will resolve our dilemma—the institution in of itself has no integrity to bring about or foster real change.

So every 2-4 years Americans become frustrated and we vote in or out the sitting party/candidate (still looking and praying for real change), but what is our alternative—Democrat or Republican (we often get more of the same).

The dumbing down of Americans have rendered us as puppets and we are not even astute enough to venture into the third party concept and I must be honest here third parties haven’t been able to financially compete with the well financed Republican and Democratic Party—so the motivation behind and/or in front of our democracy is money. Moreover, in which both of major political parties agendas are the same; thus, defend and protect the interest of the Power Elite while the true principles of democracy becomes absolved by those who possess the wealth and resources to shape democracy in their own image and likeness.

I am advocate of free speech and the U.S. Constitution grants each so-called American that right relative to the First Amendment. Thus, often the test to free speech centers on our willingness and ability to allow others this same right and opportunity even when we disagree with the speech. Now, this is where it gets a little gray, for a sovereign nation like the United States someone (U.S. commander-in-chief, Justice Department, Congress, U.S. Courts, etc.)based on interpreting the law relative to national security has to determine when certain actions/speech constitute a national security compromise, which under normal circumstances this same speech would be protected by U.S. law in spite of it possibly being distasteful or even controversial. It appears in this new era that standard of proof for U.S. citizens have been expanded, in particular under the watchful eyes of Homeland Security— social disharmony, security, safety and national security of the nation quite naturally would take precedence in some circumstances, in particular when certain activities boarders on treason and sedition; it then becomes a question of Free Speech versus a possible compromise of national security interest and national stability (at that point someone has to determine the right course). We have been taught to respect the laws of the United States of America; although, there is much that I disagree with when it comes to the question of fairness and equity, in particular when it relates to people of African descent.

The First Amendment right as it is written in the United States Constitution protects and guarantees freedom of speech and expression to all Americans and the right to choose religion and/or no religion, as well as the right to exercise political affiliation of one's choice—The United States is not a monolithic society (although, it has become a very diverse nation, but it is still far from being a true melting pot or totally pluralistic) and the evidence is pointing to the fact that we are hastily moving more towards becoming a Fascist nation—this is another leg and step towards the New World Order agenda—we are supposed to be living in a democracy (at least in theory) that is rooted in separation of church and state—possessing a participatory government.

We truly live in some dangerous times and even as we convey these type ideas which is within the realm of our so-called constitutional and legal rights; yet some will/could view these types of ideas as being treason and anti-government pursuant to the type of longitude and latitude that the United States Patriot Act possess relative to its legal language. But I have always known and understood that even prior to the era of Homeland Security former FBI director J. Edgar Hoover under the counter intelligence program Cointelpro accrued massive amounts of Dossiers on US citizens and foreign persons. These surveillance initiatives have been expanded since 9/11.

Thus, the opinions, we share and write for our cyberspace audience are no longer fully protected by our constitution and therefore, we have to walk a very thin line and pray that something that I, you and/or someone else says on the Internet forums do not render us as being possibly classified as Enemy Combatants and subject to the long arm of U.S. law. But most of us have taking everything into account based on where we are in space and time. For example, our “freedom”, lives, imprisonment and the monetary legal cost it would entail to defend our innocence if accused of violating U.S. law.

Perhaps, if I publically conveyed what I may deemed to be practical solutions, which is within the realm of U.S. law and I am against any revolutionary or subversive activities that would undermine the U.S. Government; I still think most will view some of those thoughts as being to idealistic. However, I still make every attempt to agitate the system and use whatever little talents that the creator has blessed me with to teach and reach as many people as I can. I do not have a big bully pulpit nor do I desire a massive stage; I am not that ego driven. We who classify ourselves as free thinkers have a job, duty and responsibility to the moral uplifting of humanity and that alone should be our goal.

Let me give it to you straight, I do not have the answers to all the political, economic and social problems plaguing humanity. Yet, my life has been committed to levels of activism and working within the legal and jurisprudence dynamics of the nation of my citizenship to alter change on small levels.

American capitalism is dead, it no longer has the ability to expand and produce as it did just 40 years (or better yet just 4 years ago) ago and reached its climax in 2008 (the evidence is the induce economic collapse and meltdown, which marked the death of a future prosperous capitalist system ). Our economy has been outsourced to India, China, Vietnam, Mexico, Thailand, etc., and capitalism relative to the American people has been bankrupted and the dreams of the middle class have been decimated. The Federal Reserve continues to print worthless paper that has no value and systematically fosters inflation in which the every day citizens have been placed in a chokehold, as well as the globe. We all know something has gone terribly wrong inside our government and it infringes upon the rights and liberties that the United States Constitution was founded upon. We owe this discussion on the Federal Reserve to our grandchildren and our great, great grandchildren. Perhaps the American people will come to realize that the Federal Reserve is the greatest criminal cartel in the world and may be if it isn't too late; we will take the correct action and abolish this money shakedown enterprise, which has destabilized the globe.

China has replaced the United States and the former USSR as the world's number one superpower. Thus, they have the largest standing military in the world (just based on sheer numbers they are a present and future force to reckon with). The United States capitalist helped to empower the so-called communist nation of China by systematically outsourcing its manufacturing and industry for cheaper labor and bigger financial and economic returns. China economy has soared and truly has cornered the western markets. Thus, on top of this, the United States is in debt to China for billions of dollars and really has no way to repay China. The U.S. Dollars although is considered to be the world's reserve monetary exchange, but to China and the world they see the United States dollar as being worthless and valueless (and refuse to allow it to be dumped into their economy). China has geared its education curriculums around math and science and this has made them one of the world's leaders in technology and technological advancement (our children are mastering Rap music while Asian nations are preparing their nation for global commerce). In addition, China has made huge financial and economic in roads into Africa relative to investments. They have been closely tied to Sudan and is one of the number importers of Sudanese Oil and is aiding the Afro-Arabic Sudan government in the Darfur conflict. China is on the move and there is no stopping Big Red now.

The U.S. as I have stated above has become a more repressive government since 9-11 and it’s very disturbing to the overall concept of democracy. People are fearful of speaking out and disagreeing with the government because of the potential of reprisals. This is their way of controlling dissention because no one desires to be labeled a "terrorist" and even some scholars and intellectuals are afraid to objectively assess and evaluate the political, economic and social trends because of the so-called sensitivity status associated with the 9-11 hoax, which has placed not only American citizens in a dangerous position, but the entire planet has been placed in a peculiar situation. Professors and scholars used to be able to legally protect themselves behind the status of academic freedom and had the intellectual flexibility to research and write about ideas in spite of their controversy and had little fear of censorship and consequences for expressing dissenting opinions. However, I can recall right after 9-11 many social scientists that had a difference of opinion relative to 9-11 were intimidated of being threaten with committing treason and they were forced to remain quite. I was taught early on that what make a healthy democracy are people having the right to dissent and disagree with the state. But for some 10 years after 9-11 people are even more fearful of rendering a critical analysis of the government because of the new repressive laws.

The United States is dangerous because, it has systematically convince the masses that they share a patriotic agenda with the government and the masses fail to realize that they are mere pawns in the game (the sad thing is they have no understanding that they have been duped). They/we are victims of propaganda and disinformation and we have become active participants in doing the bidding of those who do not share our political, economic or social interest. Why do we continue to support a reactionary foreign policy interest and simanteously in our Christian worldview and supremacy paradigm, we can justify war and the killing of innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan and now we are gearing up to attack Iran. But The American people are fools for the boogie man syndrome; the government keeps them thinking that they have shared interest to work collaboratively to save humanity and do not realize that they are mere tools of western imperialism.

The U.S. Government openly lied to the American people and the global community about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction and they used the media to convince us that Saddam Hussein was a threat to the national security interest of the United States and most of all stability of the Middle East and the Persian Gulf. This lie and misleading agenda led to the United States unjustly attacking the innocent people of Iraq where over 4,400 U.S. servicemen have lost their lives fighting in the interest of the Invisible Elitist and over 30,000 were wounded in which they can not get adequate long term health care or the necessary services needed to improve their quality of life upon arriving back home to the United States; thus, many have come back from war suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and the United States Government do not give a damn about these veteran soldiers when they no longer has the physical and psychological ability to enforce U.S. imperialism around the world and can no longer be used as tools of our government foreign policy. But the premises of this lie and the United States going to war in 2003 was merely based on U.S. oil interest and nothing else, which ultimately led to the U.S. and the Coalition Forces invading Iraq without due cause and with impunity. Thus, after being exposed and caught Bush and the boys would later admit that Iraq and Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. So, I do not put anything above or beneath the CIA and the U.S. Government. They are using similar propaganda against President Ahmadinejad of Iran in order to discredit him and besmirch his character because he and Iranian Government will not allow western interest to exploit Iranian oil.

The U.S. Government and the CIA has had a propensity to lie and mislead the American people and the world and there is no better example, than what took place in Iraq. They are attempting to use similar disinformation tactics and strategy against Iran and President Ahamadinejad. What have we learnt from Iraq as far as U.S. Foreign Policy relative to oil in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf? They lied and have killed millions of innocent Arab Iraqis in name of White Christian manifest destiny (Bush said the U.S. was a Christian nation in a war against the "infidels"). So I see this propaganda against Iran as a political pattern; no different than what I saw taking place in Iraq. They are working extremely hard to turn public opinion against Iran to justify a war and stealing more oil, just as they did in Iraq in 2003. Lies, lies, lies,!!!!!!!

The United States lost serious petroleum interest in Iran in 1979 after the people overthrew the Shah (via the Iranian Revolution), a U.S. puppet, who had betrayed the political, economic and social interest of the masses of Iranian people. The United States at the end of the Iranian Islamic Revolution in 1979 froze and confiscated over 25 billion dollars of the nation of Iran's money (hard core currency) and they froze other assets belonging to the people of Iran. The U.S, even to date has not relinquished this illegal confiscation. Iran has had to deal with U.S. imposed economic sanctions and embargoes, which has hindered some of their international trade efforts. Imam Khomeini nationalized the oil wealth and kicked the bloodsucking western nations out of Iran and turned the business of oil back over to the indigenous people of Persia.

The present day United States media bombardment and characterization of the Iranian Government and its president, is atypical of U.S. propaganda. They convince the ignorant American masses that President Ahmadinejad, if allowed to pursue acquiring nuclear weapons that he would be irresponsible and therefore, the United States (or overburden taxpayers would be forced to pay for another foreign war) will be pushed into another war under the pretense of disarming a so-called Muslim and Islamic fanatic while once again the real objective of stealing oil would be giving little attention in the corporate media and this motive will go undetected—I guess in the European’s mindset they should determine if black, brown, red and yellow people have the right to self-determination—Iran acquiring nuclear weapons will balance the playing field in the Middle East. I think each nation has the right to self-determination and whether, I agree with the Islamic theocracy or not, it is not the issue, but Iran as a sovereign government has the right to govern their society as they please. I respect the Islamic culture and tradition and I do not try to compare it with western democracy—it is different and unique. But the west has always has this Euro-ethnic and Judeo-Christian worldview relative to how they view the rest of the world was suppose to act and behave.

All right minded people know who is truly behind these latest reactionary propaganda ploys aimed at Iran—the United States Government is their lapdogs and do their bidding. The United States have over 4 million of its citizens incarcerated, the largest imprisonment population of a western government. This is not under Islamic Sharia law this is western democracy (we are not in a moral position to judge or direct global affairs). Thus, just take a moment and look around you. For example, the so-called Wall Street bailout robbed the America taxpayers of a standard of living—the masses of people are now destitute and have been pushed more to the 'have not' status (they are steadily losing their homes, jobs, and standard of living). We are engaged in at least two major wars (the greatest burden on the American taxpayers) and perhaps at least four (4) covert wars. These parasites now desire to further attack the poor and elderly the most vulnerable of our society by attempting to pass legislation to deny them social security benefits. I am against those capitalist who desire to continue exploit the masses (99%) while 95% of the wealth is owned and controlled by an Elitist 1% of the population. Now, that is criminal.

Fahim A. Knight-El Chief Researcher for KEEPING IT REAL THINK TANK located in Durham, NC; our mission is to inform African Americans and all people of goodwill, of the pending dangers that lie ahead; as well as decode the symbolism and reinterpreted the hidden meanings behind those who operate as invisible forces, but covertly rules the world. We are of the belief that an enlightened world will be better prepared to throw off the shackles of ignorance and not be willing participants for the slaughter. Our MOTTO is speaking truth to power. Fahim A. Knight-EI can be reached at fahimknight@ yahoo.com.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

30 comments:

Anonymous said...

You were doing pretty good until you got to the USA Iraq involvement and events leading up to it and reasons for the military actions of the USA. You only ended up showing yourself to be a blind following sheep of the Democratic Party/Black Caucus and that is pretty sad. Such a waste. You are truly an enemy to peace. I hope the Bilderburgs/Rothschilds/CFR/CIA/FBI/George Bush/Cheney/Rumsfield are watching you very closely (which they aren't because you are irrelevant) to make sure you do not amass too many arms that typically end up blowing up innocent people when finding themselves in the hands of muslims.

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

I stand on the premise that Iraq war started based on a lie in which the United States Government and the CIA falsely accused Iraq and Saddam Hussein of possessing weapons of mass destruction. Beneath the lie was a hidden objective to steal the Iraqi people's oil. I guess you find it plausible that the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Germany, United States, etc., posses a white manifest destiny—I think you would consider these to be Christian nations, but it is okay for them to carryout European imperialism throughout the world (in your mind they kill responsibly). Perhaps, you have forgotten over 1 million innocent Iraqis have been unjustly killed by the United States arm forces in Iraq and thousands are being killed in Afghanistan (these wars are about oil and dope). I think every sovereign nation has the right to self-determination and the right to defend themselves. I am more fearful of those who constructed and passed the U.S. Patriot Act and the mindsets behind Homeland security than Muslims who the U.S. characterizes as terrorist (I am fearful of President Barack Obama and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder). But you are trying to bait me into a slick trick bag conversation and dialog. We know who uses these type tactics and strategies. Anonymous—what a coward to make these type inflammatory remarks then cover yourself with a sheet. I ordinarily do not talk to GHOST.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

dtwo said...

Peace Fahim,

I hope you are well. I enjoyed this post a great deal. I agree with most of what you've written as usual. I'm not sure what world "anonymous" is living in but I think what you have to say is on point. I may not have thought this way years ago but a variety of things have happened over the years that make me question what we are being told.

Keep doing what you do. I find your posts to be extremely informative.

Peace and Power

d2

dtwo said...

Peace Fahim,

After reading your most recent post it made me think of a post written by Immortal Technique a rapper that I really like. Its long but worth reading. Its not directly related but it seems that you and Immortal have similar thoughts.

Peace

d2

http://viperrecords.com/index.php/activism/59-politics/144-the-legacy-of-bin-laden

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

Peace: Bro. d2, thank you brother for the comments as always. Some people are in serious denial about the affairs of the United States and humanity. It is evident that something has gone terrible wrong with our government and it is difficult to overlook this phenomenon. We must wake up from our slumber and it is a call for action. The Invisible Rulers are real and unless humanity wakes up they will continue to drive us to the slaughter. But some of the sheep desire to be willing participants in their ultimate demise. Also, thank you for continuing to share different conscious social activist and exposing me to different rappers and social lyrics. It often takes me time to investigate and read because I am constantly engaged in research, which requires a lot time and study. Your comments are always welcome on this forum.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

Anonymous said...

Then you stand upon a false premise. The war was not based on the claim of weapons of mass destruction. It was based upon Saddam repeatedly violating the terms of a cease fire on a war the USA won when Saddam savagely attacked, raped and pillaged Kuwait. The accusation of WMD was only for political will of the American people, just like the “Spread of Communism” was for JFK to send the first agents into Vietnam, and for LBJ to increase the numbers dramatically, leading us into a quagmire. You see, the Democrats, who did this very evil, needed something to get you to gullibly go along with the notion that the Republicans now have an equally offensive evil to wear upon their hearts. But they don’t and it has never been about the oil. What oil did the USA get? Where is it located? The only thing the USA got was a close to Trillion Dollar expenditure and the loss of some 4000 Americans. Also show me the 1 Million innocent Iraqi citizens killed because the official number is somewhere close to 120,000. That includes people killed by their own insurgents willing to take out hundreds of innocents in order to get one of ours. Just admit it, you are a blind sheep of the black identity movement. I feel for you, but you are lost in your own disillusionment so there is nothing that I nor anyone else can do for you, Your politics is black, your religion is black, and your existence is black! In that state, you could never have the tools to be good for anyone but yourself, if that. I am “Anonymous” because I am at a disadvantage, posting on YOUR site where you shamefully PROMOTE your self for your OWN ENRICHMENT. When YOU decide to PAY ME, I will consider coming out from the “sheet” (as you so scaredycattily put it, given that there are more of you Black Panthers than there are KKK members these days) and debate you openly on the subject. You are not being “tricked” to have a “dialogue”(yeah, imagine that. I guess you’d prefer to wallow in your own ignorance) with a ghost, but are just asked to deal with the facts of the argument in plain sight before you. Speak to that!

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

Anonymous: Your argument is even more flawed and I will systematically deconstruct every contention you made (you actually sound like some wide eye white supremacist patriot). Saddam Hussein was a CIA agent (everyone who is conscious knows that fact) and a U.S. Government agent provocateur. He was armed by the U.S. Defense Department and the U.S. Pentagon as a hired gun to do the bidding of United States in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf. They armed and financed him to destabilize Imam Ayatollah Khomeini and the 1979 Iranian revolution (they did not like the fact that Imam Khomeini nationalized the oil revenues). The Seven Oil Sisters and the United States had reaped huge amounts of money (billions of dollars) from Iranian oil under another CIA agent provocateur named Mohammad Rezā Shāh Pahlavi (better known as the Shah of Iran). Your cease fire argument is nothing but western propaganda and a U.S. disinformation ploy. They financed Hussein for over eight years as he killed close to a million Iranians in name of being a front man for United States interest/imperialism (he was a traitor against his own people). President George W.H. Bush (better known as Bush 1) was in bed with Saddam Hussein, but the Al-Sabah family (reactionary pawns), the ruling monarch family of Kuwait who is corrupted to the core was Horizontal drilling and was stealing oil from the Iraq side of the boarder (Hussein’s government actually caught them doing this). Bush-1 decided that Hussein had out lived his usefulness and/or purpose and decided to go to war in Desert Shield and Desert Storm in order to remind Hussein that he was getting too big for his own good. But Hussein understood that Kuwait geographically speaking belongs to Iraq because the British led to this nation succeeding from Iraq (both countries and the people are one in the same). Once again the pretext for war was that Hussein had weapons of mass destruction (this is called the big lie theory, which is often used as a tactic of western governments) he had complied with all the United Nations resolutions, but it did not matter because Bush and Cheney had serious financial interest in energy—Halliburton, etc. Now, you accused me of being a Black Panther and have described my worldview as being totally black. I believe in freedom, justice and equality. Racism is a product of western culture and society. My ancestors arrived to the Americas in the hulls of slaves hips and this historical fact alone makes me a victim of one of the greatest crimes every committed against humanity. You are anonymous because you are a scared to death coward—man-up to your comments. My 13 year old daughter has more courage than you. I make no apology that the black man is the original man. Yes, my blog is designed to enlighten those who were systematically made blind, deaf and dumb to the knowledge of self (none other than the so-called American Negro fit this description).

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

Anonymous said...

The only deconstructing that you are doing is of your own sanity. You went from declaring a million innocent Iraqi killed to a million Iranians indirectly killed. You yourself are a product of the Muslim misinformation campaign as a means to build some personal honor where there is none. Honor comes in actions, not in making up wild stories laced with bits of truthful information to make it look legit. Until you can provide the proof of your outlandish claims, such as Bush declaring Hussein living out his usefulness, then you are nothing but a liar repeating others lies for your own pathetic means. Yes, I know you can point to John Pilger and Noam Chomsky and other lame liberal Democratic sympathizers who have made their own millions off of misinformation, but those don’t count as “facts”. I gave you the simple truths, and kept it plain and simple for your small mind, but you seem to prefer to live in your lying wonderland of self-pitying victimhood. Suit yourself. I’m not a white supremacist. I love black people, just perhaps not as much as you do, given that all the problems in the world to you start with the “hidden harry hand of the blue eyed white devil” but if you would take a little time in your Nubian imagining, and dig a little deeper, you would find that all of the problems actually started with people who looked much like you, yes, including the greatest crimes against humanity known as slavery. So perhaps you are just getting your own comeuppance as a child of slave ancestors yourself. Some of us have learned from it. Seems people like you in Africa are still struggling with it, seeing that they are still practicing the greatest crime against humanity known as slavery today.

I’m not afraid of loonies like you. I get a good laugh at your expense. Expecially when I come across people like Michael Tabala, who have already shown you to be a ‘hit and run’fraud.

https://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=102972496406882&topic=103

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

Anonymous (PART-1): you sound really emotional; remember you were the one to evoke race into this discussion and now you accusing me of what you introduced into this conversation. Nevertheless, I have proven and made my point.

1). Explain to my audience what the objective of the war in Iraq was?

2). Did the United States accomplish those goals?

3). How many trillions of dollars has this war cost the American taxpayers?

4). Is Iraq a better place since President Barack Obama so-called ended the war? Does Iraq have a stable government in 2011 as U.S. troops leave this war torn nation?

5). How do you perceive former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell admitting that the initial intelligence that he received was a lie and he felt betrayed by the Bush Administration?

6). What role did the Seven Oil Sisters play in instigating the Iraq War?

7). Who is really behind this war and all wars?

8). How do you perceive former Bush staffer Scott McClellan who exposed the Iraq War as beginning on the premise of lies in his book titled, “What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception”?

9). What are your views on another top high level staffer—former CIA Director George Tenet who also agreed that the American people were grossly misled in his book titled, "At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA"?

10). What are your views on another top level Bush staffer named Richard A. Clarke who authored a book titled: “Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror”?

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

Anonymous: (PART-2)What I have given you are insiders who held top level cabinet and advisory positions to President George W. Bush. These are not Black Nationalist advocates, but civil servants that have openly said that lies were told and the American people were intentionally misled relative to the Iraqi War. You are giving me these rambling responses that possess no substance. You are a coward—man-up and defend your intellectual position and stop hiding (but we know who use these type strategies and tactics). Peeping around the corner and typing me these reactionary comments from under the kitchen table. (Booooo!!!!!)—LOL.

Now below here are some more views that I will use to even further deconstruct your weak arguments.

It was unfound political rumors and innuendos in that Iraq had in its arsenal Weapons of Mass Destruction that (this was odd because he purchased the majority of weapons from the U.S. Department of Defense) led the U.S. Coalition Forces into Iraq in 2003. Although, the United Nations inspection team found no Weapons of Mass Destruction, but the faulty intelligence wasn't enough to curtail U.S. aggression, which has destroyed Iraq and fractionized its people into various religious and political sects. However, none of this slowed the U.S. and the United Kingdom’s ability to steal oil and enrich themselves at the expense and misery of the Iraqi people. (Reference: George Tenet; “At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA).

This unjust war in Iraq has amassed tremendous financial debt for the taxpayers of the U.S. and untold human casualties, in particular on the Iraqi side—remember this war was instigated based on a lie and false allegations. Who is going charge George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, George Tenet, Condoleezza Rice, etc., with war crimes against the innocent people of Iraq and most of all for betraying the trust of the American people? Now, this amounts to a true conspiracy and high treason and none of these low level operatives have been indicted for breaking international law and United States law. Most of them are back into civilian life and are involved in the private sector. (Reference: Scott McClellan; “What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception”).

Whose economic and political interest did these poor young United States soldiers were galvanized to fight for? I am quite sure Bush, Powell, Tenet, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc., children would never be recruited or drafted into the U.S. Arm Forces infantry squads (frontline killers) in Iraq and Afghanistan. I cannot imagine these low level operatives sending their children to die on foreign battlefields in order to secure the position of the superrich. Also they are not willing to be duped into believing that these wars are being fought to make the so-called world safer for democracy (this rhetoric is strictly for the patriotic poor).

This privilege (the poor throughout history is always sacrificed for the interest of the rich) is forever reserved for the poor who is considered expendable and not for the Elite. Surely poor African Americans, Latinos, and poor white soldiers, etc., did not benefit from this war (the beneficiaries are always the hidden Dynastic Families), but I do not excuse them in their culpability and their willingness to be used as tools of United States Foreign Policy. (Reference: Thomas Leon: “Fighting Other People's Wars: A History Of America's Involvement, Sacrifice And Failure In Battling Foes In Distant Lands”).

Perhaps these Middle East conflicts are mere smokescreens and sophisticated diversionary tactics used to divide and conquer while they neutralize and isolate foreign governments deemed to be so-called potential threats to United States national security. The United States created enough propaganda around Iraq and Saddam Hussein that initially there were little opposition toward this travesty of justice. (Reference: Noam Chomsky: “Hegemony or Survival:

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

Anonymous said...

“(PART-1): you sound really emotional; remember you were the one to evoke race into this discussion and now you accusing me of what you introduced into this conversation. Nevertheless, I have proven and made my point.”

Me, emotional? You’re funny. What gave you that silly notion? And you are wrong about the injection of race. You did that in your original syllabus by referring to an “Euro-ethnic and Judeo-Christian worldview”. You also note in your signature line that your own mission is to inform African Americans, so don’t start crying about being labeled now, Bubba. You did that to yourself. LOL

“1). Explain to my audience what the objective of the war in Iraq was?”

What is wrong with your audience? They don’t know how to look up HJ RES 114 Joint Resolution to Congress for the Iraq War? I can give your audience the basics here:
{The U.S. stated that the intent was to remove "a regime that developed and used weapons of mass destruction, that harbored and supported terrorists, committed outrageous human rights abuses, and defied the just demands of the United Nations and the world".}

“2). Did the United States accomplish those goals?”

Yes, totally and completely. In case you didn’t know it, Saddam Hussien is dead and most of his top cronies are either dead or in confinement in Iraqi prisons.

“3). How many trillions of dollars has this war cost the American taxpayers?”

Less than one but that is still a lot to pay without requiring repayment in the way of some of this oil that you falsly claim was stolen by the government that protects your freedom to be threat to the American democracy.

“4). Is Iraq a better place since President Barack Obama so-called ended the war? Does Iraq have a stable government in 2011 as U.S. troops leave this war torn nation?”

It’s better if they like keeping their limbs intact and relatives alive. But stable government? Internally, I suppose they would be more stable with a Muslim Dictator torturing them on a regular basis and receiving their worship daily. Wouldn’t be stable for the world though. Thus the problem; the Dictator stepped on the civilized worlds land mine and got blown up. End of Dictator.

“5). How do you perceive former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell admitting that the initial intelligence that he received was a lie and he felt betrayed by the Bush Administration?”

I don’t know that those where his exact words, but if they were, I’d say that Colin Powell had altered his story so drastically that he himself cannot be relied upon and his ulterior motive to get someone elected into the highest office that looked more like him could have overridden good sound judgment that allowed him to rise to the top of the ranks in the military.

“6). What role did the Seven Oil Sisters play in instigating the Iraq War?”

I don’t really know or care but if they are pissed off at Iran stealing from them through the Islamic Revolution then I could understand them wanting to get it back. I would also understand them wanting to overthrow Hugo Chavez for the same type chicanery. These bastards need to be taken down and mixed into the asphalt.

“7). Who is really behind this war and all wars?”

Satan. Your point?

Anonymous said...

“8). How do you perceive former Bush staffer Scott McClellan who exposed the Iraq War as beginning on the premise of lies in his book titled, “What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception”?”

The only exposing that he did was his own point of view on the war. He is a good man. He did not accuse Bush of lieing, as you and your brand of false accusers do. The only deception he accused his boss of is “self-deception”. What is your point?

“9). What are your views on another top high level staffer—former CIA Director George Tenet who also agreed that the American people were grossly misled in his book titled, "At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA"?”

He had a lot to cover up for. He was the key authority in the American government on Iraq’s WMD. He assured Bush that it was a “slam dunk” case. That destroys the “Bush lied” false accusations right there, don't ya think?

“10). What are your views on another top level Bush staffer named Richard A. Clarke who authored a book titled: “Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror”?”

He had to find a new way to elevate himself into a huge payday after praising Bush in his kind resignation letter:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/terror-chief-dick-clarkes-resignation-letter

Anonymous said...

“Anonymous: (PART-2)What I have given you are insiders who held top level cabinet and advisory positions to President George W. Bush. These are not Black Nationalist advocates, but civil servants that have openly said that lies were told and the American people were intentionally misled relative to the Iraqi War.”

You obviously didn’t read their books. According to Michael Tabala, you have a habit of that, don’t you?

https://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=102972496406882&topic=103

“You are giving me these rambling responses that possess no substance.”

You are projecting.

“You are a coward—man-up and defend your intellectual position and stop hiding (but we know who use these type strategies and tactics). Peeping around the corner and typing me these reactionary comments from under the kitchen table. (Booooo!!!!!)—LOL.”

You are now attempting to bully, pathetic attempt that it is. LOL

“Now below here are some more views that I will use to even further deconstruct your weak arguments.”

You are a legend in your own mind, which by the way, is further deconstructing. ;)

“It was unfound political rumors and innuendos in that Iraq had in its arsenal Weapons of Mass Destruction that (this was odd because he purchased the majority of weapons from the U.S. Department of Defense) led the U.S. Coalition Forces into Iraq in 2003.”

No, it was actually solid assurances from top American officials like George Tenent, as well as in the British MI5.
Not sure what you think is so odd. You are contradicting yourself.

“Although, the United Nations inspection team found no Weapons of Mass Destruction, but the faulty intelligence wasn't enough to curtail U.S. aggression, which has destroyed Iraq and fractionized its people into various religious and political sects. However, none of this slowed the U.S. and the United Kingdom’s ability to steal oil and enrich themselves at the expense and misery of the Iraqi people. (Reference: George Tenet; “At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA).”

Spoken like a true Anti-American degenerate. You should go live in a Muslim Theocracy(which they sometimes call a Muslim Republic) and see how that works out for ya.

By the way, don’t reference George Tenet unless you are going to directly quote him. That is highly deceptive.

Anonymous said...

“This unjust war in Iraq has amassed tremendous financial debt for the taxpayers of the U.S. and untold human casualties, in particular on the Iraqi side—remember this war was instigated based on a lie and false allegations. Who is going charge George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, George Tenet, Condoleezza Rice, etc., with war crimes against the innocent people of Iraq and most of all for betraying the trust of the American people?”

That’s all pathetic bullshit from a desperate mind. Nobody is going to charge them. You will be lucky if Obama gets out without getting charged himself, along with his (and Calypso Louie’s) Chicago Crime Syndicate.

“Now, this amounts to a true conspiracy and high treason and none of these low level operatives have been indicted for breaking international law and United States law. Most of them are back into civilian life and are involved in the private sector. (Reference: Scott McClellan; “What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception”).”

Play me a violin. In fact, let your leader Louis Farrakhan do it on his golden violin in his golden palace. Sucker. LOL

“Whose economic and political interest did these poor young United States soldiers were galvanized to fight for? I am quite sure Bush, Powell, Tenet, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc., children would never be recruited or drafted into the U.S. Arm Forces infantry squads (frontline killers) in Iraq and Afghanistan. I cannot imagine these low level operatives sending their children to die on foreign battlefields in order to secure the position of the superrich. Also they are not willing to be duped into believing that these wars are being fought to make the so-called world safer for democracy (this rhetoric is strictly for the patriotic poor).”

Total left wing propaganda. I knew I had you pegged as a tool of the Black Caucus from the get go. LOL

“This privilege (the poor throughout history is always sacrificed for the interest of the rich) is forever reserved for the poor who is considered expendable and not for the Elite. Surely poor African Americans, Latinos, and poor white soldiers, etc., did not benefit from this war (the beneficiaries are always the hidden Dynastic Families), but I do not excuse them in their culpability and their willingness to be used as tools of United States Foreign Policy. (Reference: Thomas Leon: “Fighting Other People's Wars: A History Of America's Involvement, Sacrifice And Failure In Battling Foes In Distant Lands”).”

Good. Then vote for Ron Paul.

“Perhaps these Middle East conflicts are mere smokescreens and sophisticated diversionary tactics used to divide and conquer while they neutralize and isolate foreign governments deemed to be so-called potential threats to United States national security. The United States created enough propaganda around Iraq and Saddam Hussein that initially there were little opposition toward this travesty of justice. (Reference: Noam Chomsky: “Hegemony or Survival:”

Actually, these crazy Muslim run dictatorships are a threat to world peace, as are Atheist dictatorships like North Korea.

And there you go referencing again, without directly quoting. Very deceptive.

And Noam Chomksy no less....just as I said. No surprise there. LOL

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

Anonymous stated: “What is wrong with your audience? They don’t know how to look up HJ RES 114 Joint Resolution to Congress for the Iraq War? I can give your audience the basics here:
{The U.S. stated that the intent was to remove "a regime that developed and used weapons of mass destruction, that harbored and supported terrorists, committed outrageous human rights abuses, and defied the just demands of the United Nations and the world".}”

Now, you really sound ignorant and ill informed, if you think people will accept and buy into the United States Government legislation and/or public policy position relative to the Iraq War as being credible then you are perhaps fooling yourself. Thus, most of us know and understand that the majority of U.S. politicians are nothing but agents for the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and have been under the direct guidance of Henry Kissinger. The majority of them are agents of the Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission and the Council of Foreign Relations and the political, economic, and social decision they make is well crafted by their Elitist bosses; furthermore, they have always worked in the interest of these powerful organizations. Bush in 2001 blamed Al-Qaeda for bombing the World Trade Center and although there were no intelligence linking Saddam Hussein to Al-Qaeda, but he was anxious to blame Hussein and attack Iraq. He falsely used the Weapons of Mass Destruction as diversionary ploy in order to justify going into Iraq as an occupying force with the objective of seizing the opportunity to take of the Ramallah oil fields. They did not accomplish anything but unjustly killed over a million Iraqis and have acerbated the hatred for America in that region and are viewed as the enemies of the Iraqi people and the enemies of Islam. The soldiers came home a few days ago there were no wide spread victory celebrations from the masses of the American people. Most Americans were against the war in Iraq and this why you did not see any big fan fare upon their return to the United States. We know that they were merely used as foreign policy tools for the Invisible Elitist. They (the United States) killed their own agent Saddam Hussein, they had no other choice because he knew to much relative to the dirty tricks that he and the United States Government were involved in. But they have probably created hundreds of thousands of Jihadist looking to take Hussein and Osama Bin Laden place. If you call destroying Iraq’s infrastructure as being a measure of success then may be you live on a different planet. The people are more divided and destitute—there is no stability in the government. But the reactionary leaders are pawns and traitors against the legitimate aspirations of the masses of the Iraqi people. This is what you do not understand and evidently the west does not understand that they are fighting an idea, which is greater than an individual, leader or movement. The idea can not be defeated. Booooo!!!!! You coward. Hiding like some invisible devil—I no your nature. The Honorable Elijah Muhammad taught me about your nature.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

We have learned very little from the recent deceptive ploys used in Afghanistan and Iraq (business as usual) because there is no resistance demanding that these wars are unjust and we can no longer defend a lie with U.S. tax dollars nor with the blood of our young U.S. soldiers. The propaganda machines are gearing us up for an attack on Iran and they have already convinced the ignorant that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is steadily acquiring nuclear technology and weapons and this alone is justification for American imperialism to invade another Muslim country. Who gives the United States supreme authority over who should or shouldn’t have nuclear weapons?

The media is always used to demonize leaders that don’t work in the interest of the United States. They will be lied upon and their political position will be misrepresented and distorted in order create doubt amongst his own people which to neutralize his effectiveness at home and abroad. The other covert political agenda of its intended victim is the U.S. citizens, which to create false patriotism amongst it citizens and get the robots prepared to fight and defend their master’s interest. The Rothschilds see war as being profitable and they desire to take more control over the Persian Gulf oil (its not about Iran acquiring Weapons of Mass Destruction—doesn’t this script sound very familiar) and like Iraq they will instigate internal conflicts in Iran amongst various tribes and Islamic factions. The Central Intelligence Agency has been masters of this for years. They will feed the American people a heavy dose of anti-Shia Islam and anti-Sharia rhetoric and once again we will send our young men and women over to Tehran to die on foreign battlefields. Moreover, in order that the Seven Oil Sisters and the Dynastic Families could wrap their tentacles around more of the world's resources. Their objective is always theft by deception and all of your high level politicians are bought and paid for and work in the interest of the Committee of 300 in which all foreign policy is in the interest of the international bankers

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

Anonymous said...

I have read this with disgust. You are both arguing from two sides of the same coin. The rhetoric that it was a war for big oil is a ruse. Mearsheimer and Walt put together a rather complete analysis of who was behind the wars. Joseph Stiglitz, an economist, estimates that it has cost the economy three trillion and that is a conservative estimate. The bank bailouts so far is north of twenty-four trillion. The left cannot be trusted as they have long been co-opted and the right is equally corrupt. Anonymous is a lunatic.


http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/john-mearsheimer/the-israel-lobby

The book is complete in its devastation though some argue they did not go far enough.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Israel_Lobby_and_U.S._Foreign_Policy
http://www.josephstiglitz.com/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/03/AR2010090302200.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/05/iraq-war-cost-joseph-stiglitz_n_706075.html

with endless comments...

Anonymous said...

You are a completely lost and wasted mind, totally brainwashed by some self hating Nation of Idiots zombie who didn't even have the courage to listen to Malcolm X when Malcolm experienced his own awakening after his trip to Mecca. Instead he had him silenced by a bunch of armed zombies, who if they ever could think for themselves would only be able to think of how to properly hit a crack pipe. I’ll take a Zionist trying to find their way back home over an Envious Cousin Muslim Terrorist ANYDAY and will gladly enjoy watching the new National Defense Act being used to house you and your pathetic cohorts in Gitmo. But your zombie leader Louie shouldn’t be so lucky. You are the coward zombie armed panther pussy cat who spends all his prison yard time surfing the internet cutting and pasting big words and phrases from sites that you don’t even understand.

Good luck at Gitmo. You are under surveillance. :D

Anonymous said...

Well, look at that sad, confused idiot; stating that the left cannot be trusted, and then posting a slew of left wing sites. LOL

I'm sure he hasn't even read them himself. He just knows that they support "HIS SIDE" and speak ill of "THEIR SIDE". That's all that matters to him. Hahaha

What a bunch of sad, identity confused losers.

Anonymous said...

For the record, there will be no soldiers going to Iran, just environmentally conscious nukes. ;)

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

Anonymous: Perhaps you do not understand that the U.S. Patriot Act was passed 43 days after 9/11 in which Americans were stripped of their civil liberties. Thus, we live in a police state and the entire nation is under surveillance (just look around you) and they later passed the Military Commission Act and the anti-Terrorism Bill, etc. They do not need the National Defense Act—there is enough in their arsenal to suspend the United States Constitution and declare you and all of us enemies against the state. They already have that authority without the National Defense Act to do this. But I am in good company many freedom fighters have been under surveillance. For example, Marcus Garvey, Paul Robeson, WEB Dubois, Noble Drew Ali, Elijah Muhammad, Muhammad Ali, Malcolm X, Huey P. Newton, Angela Davis, Geronimo Pratt, Elaine Brown, George Jackson, etc.. The Roman Government even had Jesus (Yeshua Ben Yosef) the Christ was under surveillance; so I am in good company. Yes (second anonymous) you are right and I agree with your comments. Lastly, Minister Malcolm X was killed by FBI agents who had infiltrated the Nation of Islam and the Black Muslim movement. Yes, the triggermen where Muslims, but it has been proven that they were agent provocateurs doing the government’s bidding.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

Anonymous said...

Yes, I know all about it, and while I don't like it, I blame self-hating, paranoid kooks like NOI members and other creation hating Muslims as the reason for it. I hardly view you as a freedom fighter, standing in front of voting stations with uniforms and weapons, threatening little old white ladies. I see you more as wanting to destroy the fabric of society, all because it kills you that white people are the ones providing the freedoms that you enjoy. You'd prefer to see them as evil oppressing imperialists and that if only everything were run by black people like you, all would be hunky dory. The only probem is that you don't have any evidence in the world to show that such would be the case. I'd suggest that you give up the ego trip and just blossom where you're planted.

And about those Muslims that killed Malcolm X; they were not just Muslims, but Talmadge Hayer, Norman 3X Butler and Thomas 15X Johnson were also NATION OF ISLAM members, so if you really want to believe (and no, it hasn't been proven) that they were working for the US Government, then perhaps you better look more closely at your bruthas in your next meeting. They could be Tri-Latteralists. LOL

Anonymous said...

And about Jesus; I know Jesus. Jesus is a friend of mine. And you ain't nuthin' like Jesus.

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

Anonymouse (PART-1) stated: "You are a completely lost and wasted mind, totally brainwashed by some self hating Nation of Idiots zombie who didn't even have the courage to listen to Malcolm X when Malcolm experienced his own awakening after his trip to Mecca."

This response is typical American style ignorance relative to the Nation of Islam. Sir, you are just spewing anti-Nation of Islam propaganda. First, I am not an apologist for the Nation of Islam and Minister Farrakhan. But I will state Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam have the right to practice Islam as they see it; although, their theology may differ from so-called "mainstream Islam" what ever that means because Islam to my understanding is a very diverse religion.

You cited THE SO-CALLED NON-ACCEPTANCE OF NATION OF ISLAM LEADERS BY MECCA. Let me give you some brief history relative to Minister Malcolm X (EL-Hajj Malik Shabazz) and Minister Malcolm X's so-called Orthodox Sunni Islamic conversion as some sought of standard bearer. Sir, let me give you some history and educate you on this subject.

The Honorable Elijah Muhammad made Hajj himself in 1959 to Mecca and received a royal welcome from the Saudi Arabian Hajj committee. Elijah Muhammad taught Louis Farrakhan and the same theology that you are criticizing, was the theology that Elijah Muhammad taught and believed in when he made this so-called holy Pilgrimage to Mecca and circumambulated the Kaaba and touched and kissed the black stone that was put there by Prophet Abraham and his son Ishmael.

Minister Malcolm X was the one that set-up the Hajj trip for his teacher, Elijah Muhammad; interpreted to meaning Minister Malcolm X saw and witness Muslims in Egypt and other Islamic countries of all races and ethnic groups as early as 1959 (reference his book the Autobiography of Malcolm X).

In addition, to Elijah Muhammad making Hajj,two of his sons, Herbert Muhammad who was later known as Jabir Muhammad and his son Imam Warith Deen Mohammed (former Leader of the Muslim American Mission) all made Hajj in 1959 adhering to the FIFTH PILLAR OF ISLAM. He went their as a Muslim and left there as a Muslim and continued to teach the Nation of Islam doctrine and Elijah Muhammad never submitted to Arabs (Sunni Islam) doctrine.

On March 8, 1964 Minister Malcolm X breaks with the Nation of Islam for perhaps out of more of a political disagreement rather than a theological disagreement as many have attempted to describe. Minister Malcolm X found two distinct organizations, the Muslim Mosque Incorporated and the Organization of Afro-American Unity (OAAU), the former sacred and the latter secular.

Thus, as much as Minister Malcolm X made a public conversion to Orthodox Sunni Islam. He was deeply tied to Pan-Africanist/Nationalist Movement with his OAAU, which he modeled after the Organization of African Unity (OAU) that was very much engaged in the fight for African liberation in 1960's against European imperialism. Let’s do the math Malcolm X joined the Nation of Islam in about 1951/1952 after being released from a Michigan State prison and he spent about twelve (12) years representing Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam as their top level minister. He was assassinated on February 21, 1965; moreover, he was only out the Nation of Islam eleven (11) months before he was murdered. I do not think he had enough time to formulate a solid conversion to Sunni Islam as many maintained.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

PART 2: (Continuation): Now! what got Minister Malcolm X suspended from the Nation of Islam to my understanding and based on my research, was in 1962 President John F. Kennedy was assassinated and Elijah Muhammad gave all his Clerics strict orders not make any public comment relating to the assassination of President Kennedy.

Minister Malcolm delivered a speech that afternoon titled, "God's Judgment on White America" and after the speech, a reporter asked Minister Malcolm X to comment on the assassination of Kennedy and in disobedient to his leader, Malcolm X said it was a classical case the "Chickens coming home to roost". I AGREE WITH MALCOLM X ON THAT STATEMENT.

This disagreement (between Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam) arose out political dissension and not theological disagreement as you have ascertain. I do not talk about a subject unless I do the homework first and it is evident that you have not done your homework on this subject.

Let’s move on in 1986 Minister Louis Farrakhan and his entourage made Hajj to Mecca (and have made two additional Hajj trips to Mecca) and he too was received By King Fadh and the Wahhabi leaders in Mecca as a Muslim brother to the Arabs. Farrakhan right after the Million Man March (1995) went back to Mecca and actually did three World Friendship Tours visiting Islamic Nations from around the world. He has always been well received throughout the Islamic world.

In fact Ayatollah Khomeini allowed Farrakhan to speak at the 17th year Commemoration Ceremony of the Iranian Revolution. He spoke to over five million Shia Muslims that gathered.

Farrakhan also built and financed the construction of Sunni Mosque in Gambia, West Africa named the Alex Haley Mosque (named for Alex Haley the author of “Roots” who assisted Minister Malcolm X in writing his autobiography).

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

Anonymous here some more facts and truths aimed at deconstructing your right-wing consevative views: The Roundtable understood that they had to generate enough fear, panic and uncertainty into the American people, which to create psychological vulnerability in the American people and at the same time, deplete them of being able to make any rationale sense of the matter by consistently feeding the ignorant masses a heavy dose of Osama Bin Laden and the Al Qaeda propaganda, as well as painted Arabs and Islam as being our enemy who posed an eminent threat to our National Security Interest. These well crafted and deceptive ploys rendered the American people defenseless and the United States Government convinces them that they needed to be protected at all cost. The government deception led the American citizens into surrendering their civil liberties because so-called national safety became the top priority. Thus, in essence, the so-called war on terrorism supplied the U.S. Government with the ammunition to set the stage for the Fascist agenda.

The Congressional passing of the United States Patriot Act, which represented the first step in the Fascist plan; this legislation would replace the United States Constitution which was viewed by the Fascist agenda as a liability and not as an asset because it had too much language of protection and bestowed the U.S. citizens with certain legal buffers and provided a sense of jurisprudence entitlement to the American people. The Constitution would posed serious obstacles to the new governmental agenda that would eventually upend the American system of Separation of Powers (the basis of American Democracy); the goal was to grant the Executive Branch of government with all the power and create a legal atmosphere which would allow the president to function with complete sovereignty and autonomy; with unanswerable unilateral authority to make decisions without any accountability during peace time and in war time, and without having the interference from the other branches of government in his decision making process. The Fascist mentality has nothing but uttered contempt for the masses of the people.

After 9/11 the Roundtable used its low level operatives and stripped the American people of all its civil liberties—the state was giving supreme powers to spy and eavesdrop on its citizens telephone conversations without justifiable causes and without legal warrants, the state could conduct illegal searches and seizures without due cause, state could conduct arrest without the benefit of bail and could hold a defendant in custody indefinitely, the state took the right of due process and equal protection of the law that was guaranteed under the United States Constitution away from the people, etc., and under the Forfeiture and Seizure Act—the state could freeze and confiscate citizens money and assets with little rights to appeal.

The United States Government duped the American people into believing that they were fighting a war on a new frontier defined as terrorism and the enemy was Islam or what they like to call radical Islam—created a false enemy in order to move the masses of the people toward a newfound sense of American Nationalism and Patriotism, which is the first ideological step in creating a Fascist governmental order and structure. The American people foolishly thought that the U.S. Patriot Act was designed and implemented to protect and give the United States Military Apparatus the needed political, military and legal jurisdiction to combat alleges foreign and domestic terrorism. But the true intended victims of the U.S. Patriot Act wasn’t necessarily the so-called militant radical Islam, it was more aimed at replacing the United States Constitution and would be the legal tool that gave the U.S. Government unchecked authority and powers to demand total obedience from its citizens and be in a position to enforce these new laws without having to be concerned about dealing with legal opposition.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

FAHIM KNIGHT said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

First, questions:

1. Are Farrakhan(and was Elijah Muhammad) and the NOI Sunni or Shia Muslims? If Shia, are they Twelvers looking for the return of the al-Mahdi?

2. Did Malcolm X not change his views about the black vs white paradigm after his trip to Mecca and meeting white Muslims and Muslims of other races?


3. Are you saying that radical Islamicists are not a threat to the National Security of the US?

4. Do you realize that Islam is predominantely conservative in nature?

5. What is honorable about a man who fathered 8 children with 4 different teenagers?

6. Is it not ironic that Elijah Muhammad died the day before Saviors Day, the day he set up to honor his master Wallace Fard Muhammad, the founder of the NOI, a white man?

7. Do you believe in such a thing as an Islamic terrorist?

8. Would you be ok with an American white President stating that the entire black American race should be wiped off of the American map?

9. Would it be ok with you if it were taught in American schools that blacks were less than human and are occupiers on American soil, tricked upon us by Jewish Slave traders who got them on the cheap from black African slave traders selling off their own people for profit?

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

1. (PART-1) "Are Farrakhan(and was Elijah Muhammad) and the NOI Sunni or Shia Muslims? If Shia, are they Twelvers looking for the return of the al-Mahdi?"

Answer: Neither: You and no Islamic scholar can show me from the Qur'an or the teachings of Prophet Muhammad Ibn Abdullah (PBUH) where he taught Sunnism or Shia Islam. These schisms came after the death of the prophet in 622 A.D.

2. Did Malcolm X not change his views about the black vs white paradigm after his trip to Mecca and meeting white Muslims and Muslims of other races?

Answer: Minister Malcolm was in Egypt and Medina in 1959 according to his autobiography and was exposed to international Islam and prayed with white skinned Muslims in these two countries. But all of sudden the media wants us to believe he got this great theological awaken in 1964 when he made Hajj to Mecca. He remained a Pan-Africanist and Black Nationalist after his so-called Sunni conversion.

3. Are you saying that radical Islamicists are not a threat to the National Security of the US?

Answer: You have to ask the CIA, FBI and Homeland Security that question. The Muslims that have I met are taxpaying law abiding citizens. I see Rothschilds and the Rockefellers more of a threat to American national security and global security than Muslim radical left. But I notice you did not mention the likes of Timothy McVeigh (white nationalism and patriots), do you considered this sector as a threat to U.S. national security? I consider the white Militia movement in the United States more dangerous than radical Islam. They are able to racially blend in with the dominant racial culture.

4. Do you realize that Islam is predominantely conservative in nature?

Answer: If you deem Islam as conservative; then how do you reconcile their liberal and radical teachings aimed at western culture. Here is the fact Islam can not be viewed as a monolithic religion. There are conservative views and liberal views in Islam.

5. What is honorable about a man who fathered 8 children with 4 different teenagers?

Answer: The Qur'an does not forbid a Muslim to having more than one wife.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

FAHIM KNIGHT said...

Is it not ironic that Elijah Muhammad died the day before Saviors Day, the day he set up to honor his master Wallace Fard Muhammad, the founder of the NOI, a white man?

Answer: The Nation of Islam has always revered Master Wali Fard Muhammad, the founder of the movement in 1930. There was no revealing of no white man in 1975. Thus, Fard Muhammad describe his identity as being from the Quraish tribe from the holy city of Mecca. This was how he described his own ethnic identity.

7. Do you believe in such a thing as an Islamic terrorist/

Answer: The term terrorist and/terrorism is loosely used. For example, if you ask a Palestinian who live in occupied territories in Palestine they might call the Israeli a terrorist and visa versa. The African National Congress (ANC) they were called terrorist by the minority white government of Azania (South Africa), but the real terrorist were those who had stole the African lands. I am not in the business of determining who is a terrorist.

8. Would you be ok with an American white President stating that the entire black American race should be wiped off of the American map?

Answer: What kind of question is this? Genocide is not above them or beneath them.

9. Would it be ok with you if it were taught in American schools that blacks were less than human and are occupiers on American soil, tricked upon us by Jewish Slave traders who got them on the cheap from black African slave traders selling off their own people for profit?

Answer: The proof is over 100 millions Africans were sold in the Transatlantic Slave Trade and the Middle Passage in which millions were unmercifully killed during this horrid process. For 310 (1555-1865) years in America blacks were taught they were inferior to whites. And it continued on under the system of Jim Crow (1896 to the present). Thus, it was written in a United States Supreme Court case called Plessy versus Ferguson, a landmark decision that paved the way for legal separation and discrimination—better known as separate but equal. This was the epitome of racism.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

P.S. Part one correction typo Muhammad died in 632 A.D.