LIES, LIES, LIES: THE UNITED STATES IS OFF THE CHAIN

LIES, LIES, LIES: THE UNITED STATES IS OFF THE CHAIN

By Fahim A. Knight-El

This writer has been thinking heavily about the recent events surrounding the assassination and murder of President Muammar Qaddafi and the destabilization of Libya and the disregard for international law that was shown by France, Italy, United Kingdom and the United States relative to Libya and what is going to be the ultimate consequences on how these type so-called international discrepancies have on nation’s sovereignty in the future and ultimately on the welfare of all humanity in general. let me digress and reflect a bit, when I was a freshmen in college, I was intrigued by the culture and history of Libya, it led me to write a letter to the Libyan Embassy inquiring about the possibility of me becoming an international exchange student where I could study Islam (or religion) and learn the Arabic language. I waited and waited during that semester for a response and I never received a response from a Libyan governmental representative in which at that time, I was oblivious and somewhat naive to the politics undergirding the two nations. But I viewed this possibility as a fascinating opportunity which to learn and study abroad in a foreign nation.

President Qaddafi, I believed in 2003, felt that he had to make some political concessions because he was witnessing a changing world after the 9/11 hoax and he best understood that the world was being made and shaped completely different than what we all knew it to be prior to 9/11 and subsequently to 9/11 the west was given unrestricted power to act at one's own discretion with unconditional authority (interpreted to mean the United Nations post 9/11 became completely obsolete and the United States has become the rule and guide of how international law would be dispensed). This position alone has rendered no safe havens and/or sanctuaries for any leader or government who opposed the west (President George W. Bush once stated ‘either you are with us or against us’), in particular those who were deemed "Rogue Nations" and the Axis of Evil" nations (and just so happen that many of these so-called outlaw nations were oil wealth nations. I do not think this was mere coincidental) would have a difficult time escaping this new form of western imperialism—it has truly become imperialism without borders and restrictions. They have duped the American people and the globe into believing that their behavior (global political agenda and military aggression) since September 11, 2001 was justifiable because they were engaged in fighting international terrorism and this would be a war where the old rules would not be applicable.

I think Qaddafi deep down inside knew as early as 2003 that he had to change political course and the only thing that could help to reshape his image was to appease the west by publically taking some responsibility for the Pan Am 103 Lockerbie, Scotland incident in which the Libyan Government was accused of masterminding this tragedy. President Qaddafi handed over perhaps two suspects who were tried in European Courts and he also agreed to pay the victims families millions of dollars in restitution. He also agreed to disband his nuclear weapons program (this decision would haunt him and led to his ultimate demise and rendered him defenseless when so-called NATO troops invaded Libya) and assured the west that Libya would no longer sponsor or support terrorism. Qaddafi trusted the devil (George Bush and Barack Obama) and they invited him back into the good grace of the United Nations and the United States ended the sanctions and embargoes against Libya that had been in place for over three decades and granted Libya full diplomatic status. The west relaxed him and he did not realize that they would never forgive him for his past behavior and although he had begin to open Libya up to the Seven Oil Sisters, but in their eyes this still was not good enough—Libyan crude for the first time in over thirty-five years was flowing freely to the western governments without any embargo restrictions.

The west was never sold on President Qaddafi's new image and unknowing to him President Obama and CIA was planning and plotting for removing him from power and establishing a puppet government in Libya, which would allow them unmolested access to Libyan oil for European exploitation and global strategic position. Qaddafi did not want Libya to experience what Iraq went through and thought it would be wise to acquiesce to creating a new image and may be this would relinquish some of the tension and antagonism that existed between Libya and west. The United States used agent provocateurs to instigate internal tension in Libya and simultaneously used propaganda to demonized Qaddafi and ultimately accused him of killing his own people and this so-called justified NATO intervention—the mission had three objectives 1). To assassinate Qaddafi. 2). Take control over the Libyan oil fields. 3). Set-up a reactionary government that would serve the interest of the west for present and future interest.

The CIA attacked Libya by using NATO forces as a front in which President Barack Obama could hide his bloody and dirty hands (he is really not making these Foreign Policy decisions and actually Bill and Hillary Clinton is running the country) and make it appear that the United States had little to do with attacking and killing a Muslim Head of State. Perhaps, many of us still do not realize that 9/11 changed all the rules of the game—international law does not have the once legal jurisprudence to render impartially in which international grievance could be sorted out in an international court of justice. Thus, in the past, nations who violated aspects of the United Nations charter had legal options granted under the rules of international law. The United Nations Security Council is controlled by the United States and even the dissenting members have sat idly by and watch the United States and Europe unjustly attack smaller and weaker nations.

It was unheard of just 25-30 years ago for the United States to openly engage in state supported assassinations against heads of states—now, I am not that foolishly to believe that the U.S. were not in engaged in all manners of international crimes during the Cold War period, but these type operations were considered highly confidential and sensitive in which the Central Intelligence Agency had unlimited powers and resources to create and fight covert wars in the name of the American people. They used massive intelligence and agent provocateurs along with dirty tricks to back ruthless dictators at the behest of western interest which led to financing reactionary governments and opposing progressive revolutionary governments. Yes, since the creation of the CIA in 1947 they have instigated international wars, murdered dissident leaders (at home and abroad) and have orchestrated setting up puppet governments throughout the world and has single handily shaped United States Foreign Policy more so than the U.S. Congress and Executive Branch of our government.

Thus, prior to 9/11 decoding American imperialism was left up to the astute and those who work to thinking outside of the box and conspiracy theorist; it was their works that informed us of some of the chessboard moves that were being made outside of the eyes and ears of the American people. The United States interest has been broad based and they have been involved on all seven continents. But prior to 9/11 the United States did not openly and publically talk about tactics and strategies which to kill heads of state, although the wise amongst us knew for decades that this was part of CIA modus operandi.

I often refer to a book, I read over twenty-five years ago by Ralph W. McGehee titled, "Deadly Deceits: My Twenty Five Years in the CIA" and it was this book that opened my eyes to how the CIA used its influence, tricks, lies, military tactics, etc., in order to achieve the political end they so desired on the international scene. For example, I personally took noticed perhaps in the late 1980s when the United States attacked Panama and sent the U.S. Marshals and DEA (local law enforcement) to apprehend and arrest one of their dogs in General Manuel Noriega. Yes, the President of Panama was an international dope trafficker who worked for President George H.W. Bush— in which they ignored international law and tried and convicted General Manuel Noriega in a Miami United States Federal Court (there is no doubt General Manuel Noriega qualified for a Military Tribunal and had no business being tried in a United States Court). Noriega's conviction set a precedents of how future so-called dissident international leaders and heads of States would be dealt with—Mohammed Aidid, Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Anwar al-Awlaki, Muammar Qaddafi, etc., (no international process would be granted relative to rendering international justice).

Yet, white supremacy ideology treated the former Yugoslavia President Slobodan Milosevic with international dignity, although he carried out some of the most heinous war crimes of the 20th Century, but he was afforded a trial in the Hague, Netherland in accordance to the Geneva Convention, but none of these Arab and Muslim leaders were afforded the international courts—they were killed and assassinated—Saddam Hussein was sentenced death in a kangaroo court by U.S. henchmen posing as Iraqi judicial officials. It also did not matter that Noriega was the president over a sovereign government and should have at least been extradited to a neutral country and allowed his case to be heard in accordance to the legal standards set under international law. How could General Noriega receive an impartial hearing in the United States Courts when his accuser was President George H.W. Bush who was a co-conspirator in the Panama drug trade (as well as being involved in all of Central and South America drug cartels) and should have been put on trial himself for international drug trafficking and giving a life term prison sentence.

This event was pre-9/11 and pre-U.S. Patriot Act, but the political and legal perimeters gave life to the anti-terrorism concept and agenda, which extended the long arm of U.S. law and introduced a set of rules that would be rooted in the New World Order and render all victims inescapable (these laws were design to cast a wide net). They induced 9/11 as a highly desensitizing ploy designed to immune the American people and the globe to embracing all manners of United States imperialism without question and public outcry (the masses now accept and believe that the Government has the right to commit all types of national and international crimes in the name of so-called fighting terrorism). They have created this free pass under the guise of fighting international terrorism and the dumbfound masses are applauding (while even their civil liberties have been compromised in this new era of so-called crime fighting) and is under the illusion that the United States has taking a moral position to make the world more safer for global peace (they fail to see that these are well orchestrated chessboard moves to ensure continued dominance and control over the world's resources).

This objective supersedes all other objectives and it is the engine that drives wars, manipulates the global economy, creates disparity and misery and empowers the Super Elite to the detriment of the poor and oppressed. The United States Government under President George H.W. Bush also in Desert Storm and Desert Shield turned on another one of its traitors and dogs in Saddam Hussein after using him for over eight years (1980-1988) as a puppet to fight Imam Ayatollah Khomeini and the Iranian people with the objective of overturning the 1979 Iranian Revolution and strategically attempted to regain control of the Iranian oil fields for the benefit of U.S. exploitation (this war objective was defeated and Iraq and Hussein was led to retreat).

However, Saddam Hussein was rewarded for his loyalty; he was given more sophisticated armament, military technology, and license to kill other Muslims (Shia Muslims) and the CIA knew along time ago that he was using chemical warfare against the Kurds, but it did not matter until the U.S. Government needed an excuse to demonize Hussein, thus there was no other propaganda more suitable than conveying to the world that he was unmercifully slaughtering and killing his own people. They use the mass mediums both electronic and print which to mold and shape public opinion in their interest and likeness. Hussein became an outcast and vilified when he started scheming on the oil revenues and when he invaded Kuwait (exercising his military might), he had forgotten that he worked at the pleasure of the CIA and the United States Government and he did not have the authority to disrupt any of the existing oil arrangements established by the west in the Middle East Region (these were house rules that governed all the oil commodity players and any violation would have severe consequences).

The United States and the west after using Saddam Hussein since the early 1980s and by 1990 the relationship had run its course with the culmination of Operation Desert Storm. The United States in 2003 attacked Iraq under the false pretense that Saddam Hussein possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction (they already knew what was in his arsenal because they sold him billions of dollars of weapons made in the USA), but in reality the CIA, Pentagon, and the U.S. State Department had bankrolled and financed Hussein for decades because he served as a buffer between the theocratic and fundamentalist Iranian Government (whom the west had lost their influence due the toppling of another one of their dogs in Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi) and Khomeini nationalization of the oil wealth of Iran to the detriment of the interest of the Seven Oil Sisters and western governments in which it was this variable fueling this dispute. This war was not about land encroachment or Shia versus Sunni, it was about who would control the oil flow and wealth of the Persian Gulf (Iran), it became simple oil lesson 101, they desired control over the oil in Kuwait and control the Rumaila oil fields in Iraq.

These moves gave the United States and the west huge oil interest in the Persian Gulf because for decades now they already have had the reactionary Saud Family of Saudi Arabia (the world’s largest oil reserve and supplier) in their back pocket and these Wahhabi Sunni traitors who are the gatekeepers of the Kaaba (the holiest house in all of Islam) in Mecca are pawns of the worst kind and has betrayed all Muslims based on their whorish relationship with the United States and the west. Saudi oil should be renamed United States oil that is who controls and manipulate the supply and demand, quotas, and determines international market pricing. Saudi Arabia is the 52 nd state of the United States and is a protectorate similar to the old colonial style relations that existed between Great Britain and its colonies. I personally can not follow any Muslim or Islamic leadership coming out of the east (especially out of Mecca and Medina) and as a Free Thinker I detest these Arabs and their religious hypocrisy (they are not Muslims but are members of the Synagogue of Satan). So lets be clear I do not follow any of their Qur'anic guidance because the entire Islamic faith has been co-opted by western forces and to be truthful with my readers I left religion along time ago. So I am not bind or obligated to any faith tradition—I am student of truth who is in constant search for enlightenment—the Torah, Gospel (new biblical testament) and the Qur’an based on man’s interpretation has led to the spiritual demise of humanity.

This writer has stated above that a precedent has already been set and the last man standing is President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran and his defiance is not settling well with the United States and Israel—like other above mentioned leaders he is being accused of being to ambitious relative to his nuclear weapons program. The United Kingdom in a recent action imposed economic sanctions against Iran and for no apparent reason the United Kingdom froze some of Iran's assets and Iranian students protested by storming the British Embassy in Tehran—the European Union and European Common Market will inevitable fall in which the Euro has been devalued by the Bank of England and the Central Banks of various European nations serve at the pleasure of the Rothschilds who are behind this latest crisis with Iran and the economic meltdown in Europe is all their concoction—front organizations such as the Royal Institute of International Affairs along with the Rothchilds are also directing public opinion relative to Iran.

The Middle East Media Research Institute: Stated, “On September 12, President Ahmadinejad ordered the U.S. dollar to be replaced with the euro in the country's foreign exchange accounts. Iran has also called on other OPEC members to avoid the falling dollar in favor of the more credible euro. Oil is Iran's major source of foreign currency, but oil is pegged to the U.S. dollar, as are the currencies of the major oil-producing countries in the Gulf. These countries, particularly Saudi Arabia, have persistently declined to unpeg their currencies from the dollar [Kuwait did partially unpeg] and, hence, oil will continue to be priced in dollars. Since the dollar and the euro are broadly available convertible currencies, there is nothing preventing Iran from converting its dollars into euros whenever it chooses to do so”.

“One suspects, however, that Ahmadinejad's edict has to do more with fear than with economic wisdom. Iran is rightly afraid that new and more stringent sanctions due to its nuclear policies could lead to the freezing of its dollar assets in U.S. banks or even in major European banks who conduct major businesses in the U.S. This move, therefore, will help decouple Iran from the U.S. banking system. It will be recalled that in the mid-1990s Iraqi president Saddam Hussein decreed that Iraqi oil should be paid for in euros to "punish" the United States. Iran did not say whether the new policy was designed to do the same thing”.

The United Kingdom just like the United States has to engage in wars in order sustain a dying economy and Iran and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the last man standing and he like Qaddafi and Hussein has stood up against European imperialism and has advocated Iranian self-determination—this alone has made him a dangerous man in the eyes of the west. Perhaps what has gotten Iran and Ahmadinejad in this latest trouble is his talk about shifting his monetary system toward the Petrodollar, which will empower his oil wealth nation outside of the total control of the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England. This aspiration alone is a declaration of war and the Rothchilds will not sit idly by and allow this to occur. Here is my prediction they are going to attack Iran and Syria and many more U.S. soldiers will lose their lives in order to make the Invisible Rulers and the Dynastic Families more wealth—their dying will be in vain.

Fahim A. Knight-El Chief Researcher for KEEPING IT REAL THINK TANK located in Durham, NC; our mission is to inform African Americans and all people of goodwill, of the pending dangers that lie ahead; as well as decode the symbolism and reinterpreted the hidden meanings behind those who operate as invisible forces, but covertly rules the world. We are of the belief that an enlightened world will be better prepared to throw off the shackles of ignorance and not be willing participants for the slaughter. Our MOTTO is speaking truth to power. Fahim A. Knight-EI can be reached at fahimknight@ yahoo.com.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El